| Author |
Topic  |
|
Benpearse
Junior Member

300 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 04:00:44
Basically some folks exploiting the current rules ie laoman, sonic et al, for their own advantage.. and it's working!!!I suggest making red people lose the privilage of a sz Make things a damn sight harder for them.. also they won't then be able to go afk SO IT IS ACTUALLY A REAL PUNISHMENT For those who accidentally go red... be more careful!!! I think this would settle some of the really annoying parts to this game at present  Post your views and maybe it might happen!!! though I for one won't be holding my breath |
Benpearse
Junior Member

300 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 14:57:29
~BUMP~
|
Skidd
Senior Member
  
United Kingdom
1436 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 15:08:26
Yep that would be much better.In-game name Surberous Know yourself and you will never be defeated in 100 battles |
Sam_at2001
New Member
67 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 16:57:58
I'm sorry, but what is SZ? :) Knowing me, its probably something really obvious..Grecko-Level 26 Warrior |
Calen
Junior Member

United Kingdom
198 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 17:04:14
safe zone :)Taoist of the 27th level Mage of the 24th level |
_Kori_
Starting Member
31 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 17:06:06
Well i had no idea but then i engaged brain and realised....... SZ = Safe Zone " ...they mostly come at night, m0stly..." |
Gelentium
Senior Member
  
1057 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 17:33:42
I dont agree.the ppl abusing the logging out thingy dont go red, the only ppl to gain from this are the ppl abusing it. It means that the ppl logging out cant make others go red then attack them legally in a safe zone. the only ppl that will lose out from this are those that have been attacked by these arseholes. Hell knows, a lot of ppl attack the reds for no reason but the fact that they are red. You say the ppl attacking back should be more carefull, well yes that is true, but can be hard to put into practice. I am a tao, if this tactic is used against me then i have to wait for him to log back in then hit me again, this means he very close to me. to stand anychance of killing him i heed a little distance so i can move poison and amulets about, get a skel going at him etc...Yet i have no distance or time becasue he is wasting me, and he hits real hard. The way to stop this is for a GM to come and witness what is happening while in invisible mode and remove the offending characters from the game. We pay for this game and are effectively under contract to behave or be deleted, the GM are also under contract to uphold the rules, which they are not doing. This game can be bad enough with lag and everything to be putting up with crap from other players. they would only have to delete a few abusers before ppl get the message that it wont be tolerated, just like they did with the speed cheat. A couple of nights work from a GM would put an end to this once and for all, yet we talking about changing the game mechanics to compensate for other ppls selfishnesh and unsocialism. There should be bloody GMs online, i really cant understand why they are not, is a complete disgrace, is a free for all in Mir, not the bloody game they intented to make. I think it is time the GM made an example of these people, and soon. Toast: Level 6 (87%)
 |
Gav La
Junior Member

United Kingdom
133 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 17:38:35
I think penal should have a safe zone for reds, but not towns, I've been red twice, both for good reason, you know how some people are they deserve it. Each time I went afk in penal to go yellow which is fine playing red is a nightmare when your not really a pk. But one time I was playing with my n00b warrior and there was a red pk posioned him in mw, I quickly switched to my tao to kill him, but when he got on low health he ran into safe zone, I dont see why they should get santuary in places where they're not supposed to be in.
Gav La TheDragonSenate Minister I never meant to fade.... away
Edited by - Gav La on 01/05/2002 17:39:27 |
Gelentium
Senior Member
  
1057 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 17:51:49
ok then, make it impossible to heal reds in safe zone, and they dont regen in safe zone.You admit yourself that sometimes you go red for valid reasons, if the rule was no reds in safe zone then it would work against you too. Pking is part of the game, ppl are actually punished enough for being red, they cant go into towns, are often killed by ppl for colour alone. We are talking about the logging out/in cheaters, well they do that so they dont go red, so i dont really see the point of making safe zone unusable to red as a way of stopping them doing it, cos they are not red. If you made this rule for even one night then the ppl abusing game would be laughing, they wear crap items so dont lose anything of value even if they die. Thier intention is to make ppl go red so they lose all thier stuff when they get killed, you are playing right into thier hands. Toast: Level 6 (87%)

|
jonny6296
Junior Member

United Kingdom
141 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 19:45:51
yet another abbreviation goes in the vocab! SZ! even though ''safezone'' is only 8 letters long!!!! i dont see the need in callin it SZ however WOOMATAURUS (WT) has a point! i have a new abbreviation HN = HEN......god im so unfunny and boredJonny6296 LvL 30+ Warrior |
Skidd
Senior Member
  
United Kingdom
1436 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 19:57:58
i think there are arguments from both sides of this but there are some good points from both sides.In-game name Surberous Know yourself and you will never be defeated in 100 battles |
Gelentium
Senior Member
  
1057 Posts |
Posted - 01/05/2002 : 19:58:22
quote:
yet another abbreviation goes in the vocab! SZ! even though ''safezone'' is only 8 letters long!!!! i dont see the need in callin it SZ however WOOMATAURUS (WT) has a point! i have a new abbreviation HN = HEN......god im so unfunny and boredJonny6296 LvL 30+ Warrior
can you then tell me why you spell vocabulary as vocab! even though it would have only meant 4 more keystrokes? bored too Toast: Level 6 (87%)

|